Donate!
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register :: View Members
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Raask Pipe (Read 42 times)
Kropatchek
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

Why more than 1
cylinder?

Posts: 1457
Alphen a/d Rijn  Netherlands
Gender: male
Raask Pipe
07/13/04 at 16:11:07
 
Thinking of installing a Raask Pipe.  Grin
There are 2 models:
the 60 mm double wall pipe  and the 2" single wall. I like the look , especial the straight cut .  Question to the experts ( Greg_650?)
1) Noise, is there any damping?
2) Double or single wall?
3) Carburetor jets replacements?
thanks for info.
Back to top
 
 

Never ask your bike to scream before her throat is warm.
'93 Sav in '96 ( yellow) looks
  IP Logged
koiroy
Ex Member




Re: Raask Pipe
Reply #1 - 07/13/04 at 16:17:15
 
8) A great pick for a pipe style but not cost efficient for most of us. Love to see of a pic of it installed. I think Greg may agree with the double wall type since the dreaded blueing isn't an issue. I went with the $75 slash cut glass pack that I am thrilled with. What a great sound!!! A little blueing though. The $350 price for the Raask I couldn't justify.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
jendesigner
Junior Member
2004 No Login
**
Offline

Stop, Drop and Chop

Posts: 99
Chicago suburbs
Gender: female
Re: Raask Pipe
Reply #2 - 07/14/04 at 05:48:56
 
I have the 50mm pipe, both pipes are 2-wall not just the 60mm pipe. When I bought mine the 50mm was the only option. (I didn't pay $350, that would make me think twice). If I bought one today I would go with the 60mm. I like the look and it keeps it away from the rear brake adjustment screw. I also use the baffle. It is loud enough. If I remember right Greg does not use the baffle. You will have to rejet. It is expensive but I really like the look and sound. I seem to justify my additions to the bike by telling myself I didn't pay that much for a used 1995 bike so I'm still ahead somehow Smiley I can take some photos of it and post it on my site later today.

Here is a link to my bike right now. I will update later.
http://f2.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/jendesigner/album?.tok=pherjNBB6Zmni94S&.dir...
Back to top
 
 

Jen
  IP Logged
Gargoyle
Ex Member




Re: Raask Pipe
Reply #3 - 07/14/04 at 06:46:31
 
I have a straight thru drag pipe(not Raask). I had to rejet. However I also am using a K&N clamp on filter. My quess is you will still have to rejet even if you use stock air cleaner with a Raask. I recently contacted Raask about a pipe. They quoted me something like $230 for the pipe and $100 dollars shipping from Europe. I installed a $10 Auto Zone tailpipe extention(2"X24").
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
PRH111
Ex Member




Re: Raask Pipe
Reply #4 - 07/14/04 at 09:49:54
 
Perhaps it would be cost efficient if a group of 10 people were to all buy the Raask pipe shipped to one address.  The overseas freight would therefore be significantly reduced and UPS ground is not very expensive.  Perhaps the Raask pipes may even be obtained at a slightly discounted price due to the large order.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Kropatchek
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

Why more than 1
cylinder?

Posts: 1457
Alphen a/d Rijn  Netherlands
Gender: male
Re: Raask Pipe
Reply #5 - 07/14/04 at 16:50:41
 
PRH111 wrote on 12/31/69 at 16:00:07:
Perhaps it would be cost efficient if a group of 10 people were to all buy the Raask pipe shipped to one address.  The overseas freight would therefore be significantly reduced and UPS ground is not very expensive.  Perhaps the Raask pipes may even be obtained at a slightly discounted price due to the large order.

Sorry to let you down on this deal > I'm ordering from The Netherlands and Sivert Raask quoted me 255 for the 60mm pipe 220 for the 50mm and 40 shipping, all in Euros.
What I want to know is: what mainjet seize do I need?
Back to top
 
 

Never ask your bike to scream before her throat is warm.
'93 Sav in '96 ( yellow) looks
  IP Logged
Savage_Greg
Serious Thumper
Alliance Member
*****
Offline

Don't go around your
ass to reach your
elbow...

Posts: 7844
SW Washington State
Gender: male
Re: Raask Pipe
Reply #6 - 07/16/04 at 11:48:39
 
koiroy wrote on 12/31/69 at 16:00:07:
8) A great pick for a pipe style but not cost efficient for most of us. Love to see of a pic of it installed. I think Greg may agree with the double wall type since the dreaded blueing isn't an issue. I went with the $75 slash cut glass pack that I am thrilled with. What a great sound!!! A little blueing though. The $350 price for the Raask I couldn't justify.



$350?  I paid $280 direct to the factory which covered S&H and the wire transfer, too.  They also included a cool ballcap with mine.

The double wall is great and the chrome finish is much better than stock (with Raask signature on the end).  Plus it is about 5 pounds lighter, doesn't need a muffler clamp, and the best part....the ID is bigger than the stock header.  We are talking more FLOW now too.... Shocked
Back to top
 
 


  IP Logged
Kropatchek
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

Why more than 1
cylinder?

Posts: 1457
Alphen a/d Rijn  Netherlands
Gender: male
Re: Raask Pipe
Reply #7 - 07/16/04 at 16:26:34
 
Still remains the question : what jets to put in the carburator????????????????
Back to top
 
 

Never ask your bike to scream before her throat is warm.
'93 Sav in '96 ( yellow) looks
  IP Logged
Savage_Greg
Serious Thumper
Alliance Member
*****
Offline

Don't go around your
ass to reach your
elbow...

Posts: 7844
SW Washington State
Gender: male
Re: Raask Pipe
Reply #8 - 07/17/04 at 04:26:06
 
Kropatchek wrote on 12/31/69 at 16:00:07:
Still remains the question : what jets to put in the carburator????????????????


This is what I did...the engine only seems to be slightly lean when cold, with only an occassional pop.  It goes away when it warms up....no black smoke and never a backfire at all.

1. I drilled out the plug on the idle mixture screw and adjusted it richer.
2.  I found a spacer for the jet needle that was 1/2 thickness of the original.  From about ~3 mm to 1.5 mm (~.100" to .050") to raise the needle a little bit.
3.  I installed a #155 main jet.

All those seem to have gotten the carb jetting close to those in the original 1986 models.  I didn't think that just removing the spacer was the best way to go.  At 60oF I don't ever need any choke and if colder only to start it and I turn it off right away.

For the main jet, I think that I could actually benefit from a #157.5 or #160 main jet, but I haven't gotten around to getting one.  The reason is that the ID of the Raask is larger (throughout) than the stock header pipe so there is better flow than with the 1986 exhaust.  I also have a K&N pod filter too.

Remember....I did all this from experimentation because I first had a SuperTrapp and then got the Raask.  My wife is running the Trapp on hers now with a #152.5 and a stock intake and stock needle jet.  She also has no backfires.
Back to top
 
 


  IP Logged
Kropatchek
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

Why more than 1
cylinder?

Posts: 1457
Alphen a/d Rijn  Netherlands
Gender: male
Re: Raask Pipe
Reply #9 - 07/18/04 at 07:52:17
 
Grin Grin Grin
Thanks Greg.
Back to top
 
 

Never ask your bike to scream before her throat is warm.
'93 Sav in '96 ( yellow) looks
  IP Logged
Savage_Greg
Serious Thumper
Alliance Member
*****
Offline

Don't go around your
ass to reach your
elbow...

Posts: 7844
SW Washington State
Gender: male
Re: Raask Pipe
Reply #10 - 07/18/04 at 09:56:31
 
Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Anytime....
Back to top
 
 


  IP Logged
klx650sm2002
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

The more I learn the
less I know.

Posts: 2041
Cumbria,England
Gender: male
Re: Raask Pipe
Reply #11 - 07/18/04 at 10:13:48
 
Gas flow, way to go  Grin

Clive W
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print


« Home

 
« Home
SuzukiSavage.com
05/11/25 at 18:29:27



General CategoryRubber Side Down! › Raask Pipe


SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2!
YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.