If
Just
ONE
of the Official Authorities who had ample opportunity to step in HAD done what they should have,
This conversation wouldn't be happening.

If a few teachers had been armed,
We might still be having the conversation,
But the number dead and wounded would likely be
Much lower.
The history of the shooters shows they usually surrender or suicide when confronted.

Hard to believe you're serious.

That's every bit as respectful to the constitution as the ruling that allows abortion because the unborn are neither born nor naturalized.

[quote author=6D4459464E5947526744585F6A595F42585F2B0 link=1519162280/45#51 date=1519593056]justin_o_guy2 wrote on 02/24/18 at 23:25:52:

pay no attention to the jog behind the curtain

justin_o_guy2 wrote on 02/25/18 at 13:39:07:



then you really misunderstand the abortion ruling:

The U.S. Supreme Court, in 7-2 vote, agreed with Roe that Texas's law criminalizing abortion violated her right to privacy. But the Court held that states do have an interest in ensuring the safety and well-being of pregnant women, as well as the potential of human life.

Acknowledging that the rights of pregnant women may conflict with the rights of the state to protect potential human life, the Court defined the rights of each party by dividing a pregnancy into three 12-week trimesters:

During a pregnant woman's first trimester, the Court held, a state cannot regulate abortion beyond requiring that the procedure be performed by a licensed doctor in medically safe conditions.
During the second trimester, the Court held, a state may regulate abortion if the regulations are reasonably related to the health of the pregnant woman.
During the third trimester of pregnancy, the state's interest in protecting the potential human life outweighs the woman's right to privacy, and the state may prohibit abortions unless abortion is necessary to save the life or health of the mother.

and no point does it mention "naturalization" for anything.  and the gun debate I put up above also has NOTHING to do with naturalization or born or unborn or ANYTHING OF THE SORT.

I posted that article to refute this idea that NRA is somehow pro-background check, it proves that they have a long history of supporting anti-background check movements.  

-----

you're going to have to start actually explaining your drive-bys if you want to, as you keep saying, have reasonable rational discussion about them.  

the Roe V Wade decision regulates the constitutional right to privacy based on the sanctity of the right of human life, why can't the constitutional right to bear arms be regulated based on the same thing?


or are you arguing that both the constitutional right to privacy and the right to bear arms should both be equally "unabridged" to the max?

T And T Garage wrote on 02/20/18 at 13:31:20:


Hmm... seems some folks on here cant remember what the original topic was...

See above.

Fake news?... Faux News...